‘Uncertain and slightly dangerous’ 1/3

Black Homeownership & Generational Wealth
(in 3 parts)


“If you are African American or otherwise and you have good income and good credit, having a home is an asset, like your 401(k). Understand it’s an asset. It’s not all peaches and cream. Like anything else, there are issues, but it is a home. And that home over time historically has allowed African Americans to create wealth, not only for themselves, but for generations to come.”

– Aaron Smith in “Declining Black Homeownership Has Big Retirement Implications“, Forbes.com, May 10, 2017

Motivation: Black Homeownership & Generational Wealth

Another motivation for this project is homeownership as an American of African descent, and more specifically, as someone descended from those Africans who were taken to this nation enslaved. I hope it becomes an asset that I can not only pass down to potential children as generational wealth once deceased (or family, friends or organizations should I not have children), but that can also serve as a place of shelter, rest, restoration, hospitality, and refuge for myself and others, while I am still living.

The title for this motivation-in-three-parts comes from the SparkNotes description of the end of Lorraine Hansberry’s play, A Raisin in the Sun (emphasis added):

The Youngers eventually move out of the apartment, fulfilling the family’s long-held dream. Their future seems uncertain and slightly dangerous, but they are optimistic and determined to live a better life. They believe that they can succeed if they stick together as a family and resolve to defer their dreams no longer.”

Despite the racial climate and the adversity that will come from integrating a white 1950s Chicago neighborhood, the Youngers move forward. Their decision is full of uncertainty, full of significant potential to become targets of violent physical and/or violent verbal opposition, but is more importantly full of hope, courage and walking-out the knowledge of their worth and equality. They seek a quality of life that will grant them greater autonomy and financial stability, both during their own lives and for their descendants.

The goals of these next three posts are to create a layman’s guide to the following topics:
  • The status quo of homeownership in the United States,
  • The known benefits of homeownership versus renting,
  • Historical and persistent obstacles to homeownership unique to the non-Hispanic Black American population, and
  • Black homeownership numbers, reports, analyses and policy suggestions for achieving wealth equality compiled by organizations and experts carrying out this research for a living.
Homeownership in the United States & An Infamous Net Worth Study in Boston

Homeownership Rates in the US & Questions They Beg

According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Quarterly Residential Vacancies and Homeownership report released Thursday, July 26, 2018, at the close of Quarter 2:

  • The nation-wide homeownership rate was 64.3%
  • The regional homeownership rates were:
    • Midwest – 68.3%,
    • South – 65.9%,
    • Northeast – 61.3%
    • West – 59.7%
  • Homeownership rates by age were:
    • 65 years and older – 78%
    • 55 to 64 years – 75.1%
    • 45 to 55 years – 70.6%
    • 35 to 44 years – 60%
    • 35 years and younger – 36.5%
  • Homeownship rates by race were:
    • Non-Hispanic White alone – 72.9%
    • Black alone – 41.6%
    • Hispanic (of any race) – 46.6%
    • Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander alone – 58%
    • Other – 55.7%

From these simple numbers, as a layperson and NOT an expert, my mind goes down the following paths of data analysis. Please receive these as hypotheses or questions about the implications of the differences above:

  1. Is there greater home affordability, easier achieve-ability of homeownership, more numerous occurrence of home inheritance in the Midwest and the South than in the West or Northeast? The red and blue map of Electoral College results for the 2016 Presidential election flashes in my mind. I make this remark not to imply a correlation between home-owning, renting and any negative associations (pervasive in the social climate) with the way a particular state or region voted. I make this remark as I ponder how the advantages of homeownership versus renting may contribute, reflect, or correlate with differing voter values in a particular community: neighborhood, city, county or state.
  2. As we get older, do more of us come to the conclusion, at least by retirement, that buying is the best way to go, preferring owning our own home to renting? How do we come to that conclusion? Do we find ourselves in a better financial situation than in our youth? Are we married? Is our college debt finally paid off? What factors contribute to the 35 and younger crowd’s homewonership rate being drastically lower than the other age groups? Also, 35 doesn’t sound very young compared to what I know of homebuying ages and rates in previous decades, before I existed. Hint: There are already many articles investigating homeownership trends and challenges for millennials. Here’s one from July 11, 2018, published by the Urban Institute. I reference an April 2018 Policito article on millenial homeownership in my previous post “Motivations: Affordable Housing, City Living & Settling Down”.
  3. Black people in this country are the least likely to own a home in the comparison of “races”. Why? What impact is this having on black net worth, generational wealth, financial stability and quality of life today? Two Washington Post articles from April and July 2018 touch on answers to this question reading:
    • “We haven’t made any progress in homeownership since the passage of the Fair Housing Act in 1968… The little progress we did make has been wiped away by the foreclosure crisis.” -Nikitra Bailey, Executive Vice President at the Center for Responsible Lending, Washington Post, July 6, 2018
    • In the Washington Post’s May 2018 article,“Black homeownership is as low as it was when housing discrimination was legal”, we read: “Owning a home can increase a family’s financial security, but black people and other minorities significantly lag behind white people in homeownership rates, a major factor contributing to the racial wealth gap.” – Alanna McCargo and Sarah Strochak of the Urban Institute

“The Color of Wealth in Boston”, a Relevant Case

With the knowledge that homeownership rates are second-to-lowest in the Northeast and lowest among Black alone and Hispanic groups, I segue to a 2015 publication that solidified black homeownership as a stand-alone motivation for my project:

wait for it… Keep reading! 😉

As stated in the April Politico article, tech jobs are increasing in cities like Boston, as well as the salaries paid for those positions, yet and still, even some well-paid tech workers are finding homeownership elusive. We cannot, however, stop here in our portrait of the aspiring city homeowner nor in our consideration of the obstacles in the path of their goal. We must dig further to investigate the distribution of this new wealth across a variety of demographic groups. Only then will we more fully understand the dynamic picture of who benefits, who does not, and how wealth distribution subsequently influences an individual’s or family’s ability to own a home in a city like Boston. To not dig further would be oppressive and marginalizing in its colorblindness.

The study that solidified black homeownership as a motivation for this project was: “The Color of Wealth in Boston”*. It was jointly published on March 25, 2015 by Duke University, The New School and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. It’s data affirms, for me, that while the wealth-cake may be growing in height, the layers are glaringly, absurdly, mournfully uneven. One of the four key findings of the summary reads:

“Nonwhite households have only a fraction of the net worth attributed to white households. While white households have a median wealth of $247,500, Dominicans and U.S. blacks have a median wealth of close to zero. Of all nonwhite groups for which estimates could be made, Caribbean black households have the highest median wealth with $12,000, which is only 5 percent of the wealth attributed to white households in the Boston [Metropolitan Statistical Area].

To be specific with the numbers in this report, the median net worth of a US Black household in the city of Boston was 8$ in 2015. The median net work of a Dominican household in the city of Boston was $0 in 2015. Net worth, for the record, is the the subtraction of one’s debt from one’s assets. Perhaps the following question is striking you at this very moment: How does it happen that there is a median net worth gap of a quarter of a million dollars between two ethnic groups?

To conclude part one of this three part series, I end with a second key finding of the Boston study. The transition from the previous paragraph to this next quotation may feel heavy handed in its emphasis on the correlation between homeownership and wealth, but as I seek to highlight in part two of this series, homeownership may be just that big of a deal. Wealth building is not dependent on homeownership alone, of course not, but if you are in doubt of homeownership’s significance, it warrants taking a second look. Again, I am still a layperson. A second finding of the Boston study is that “close to 80% of whites [in Boston] own a home, whereas only one-third of U.S. blacks, less than one-fifth of Dominicans and Puerto Ricans, and only half of Caribbean blacks are homeowners.”

Homeownership is one of the main avenues Americans have for building wealth,” writes Jonnelle Marte in her July 6th article for the Washington Post

Well, how so? I want to learn more.

What are the benefits of homeownership versus renting?

What might it take to get there?

How long might could that road be, and why do many say it’s still worth it?

Next up: Uncertain and slightly dangerous’, Motivations: Black Ownership & Generational Wealth 2/3


Copyright © 2018 A.M. Wilsonne

*Much more data can be found when reading the full report for “The Color of Wealth in Boston.” As an additional note, I do appreciate how they break down the black and brown groups. There is cultural nuance between and within communities of black and brown people. We do not all come from one collective group starting point in our history, challenges, heritage, adversity, etc.

Strides: Update 1


Welcome to Strides: Update 1. In these posts, I will update you on the real-life:

  • steps I’ve taken,
  • progress I’ve made,
  • people I’ve connected with and
  • golden takeaways

on this journey to find home in the country, on a budget, as a B.A.M.F.



The truth is, I am much further along than I’ve let on when it comes to making moves toward realizing this desire. In fact, I am getting so far ahead of myself, that I’m afraid I may never catch up to reporting on how things are proceeding! So, below is a quick overview of what I’ve been up to.

I have:

  1. Budgeted, researched, applied and been pre-qualified for a loan;
  2. Connected with real estate agents in a couple states and a few regions for updates on new postings;
  3. Researched the cities/towns where the land is located and got an idea of the history, demographics, social and economic priorities, local governance, and cultural characteristics of the region through town websites, Wikipedia, local newspapers and local podcast episodes;
  4. Visited properties;
  5. Interacted with, reached out to and connected with the people who live and work in the community along the way;
  6. Made an offer (still in the negotiating stage) and
  7. Realized that independent of this offer’s acceptance, I like the town. If this offer doesn’t work out, I’d like to seek other opportunities to buy in the area.


My sense of urgency to write this *Special Bulletin* reached ‘must do!’ at step #5.  The most benedictory* step of all seven steps above has been connecting with the people–individuals–in these communities along the way. (*Benedictory is a adjective meaning it’s been a blessing.)

I’ve realized that with every conversation and correspondence with the residents of a small town, I am investing in my potential future community. Though our connection may begin as a professional, procedural, or an informational encounter, in a smaller community, there is a higher chance that an individual will become a long-term acquaintance (at the grocery store, the gas station, the market, the hardware store or the coffee shop) outside of the initial professional objective.

The humanity of deciding to live somewhere continues to hit me with each person I encounter on the way to purchasing property. By humanity, I mean the difference between engaging people as means to ends whom you likely won’t connect with beyond that moment, versus viewing the interaction as an introduction to a new, open-ended, potentially ongoing rapport. My positive interactions with a particular town, for example, have convicted me that I may like to live there whether my offer is accepted or not! So far, people have been more patient, helpful, kind and generous with me, a stranger, than I dared dream still existed after years of city-living. This has occurred again and again. I think I’ve tapped into something of the culture of the place: prevalent hospitality. And I like it, very much.


I’ll close with a highlight on recent connections made when trying to learn about a region’s racial climate.

In order to gain primary source insight on challenges I may face as a B.A.M.F. in a rural, European American majority community, I reached out to the state ACLU and the nearest chapter of the NAACP*.

To the point- They were excited to hear of another person of color considering moving to their state/region. Without hesitation, they encouraged me to get in touch, and by phone, if in need. ::jaw drop:: ::beaming smile:: Prior to the above ideas to reach out to the ACLU and NAACP, I had thought myself lucky to cross the path of other black people (plural) period, depending on where I looked for land. The earnest responses from the ACLU and NAACP was tremendously encouraging. What they had to share was also substantially sobering.

I’d like to summarize what I learned about what the day-to-day experience of life in a white rural setting, socially and emotionally, as a minority, will/can bring.

As a minority:

  1. I will feel/be both “invisible” and “hyper-visible”.
  2. It can feel/be very isolating. It can/will be hard.
  3. But also, if you can persevere in 1 and 2 “with persistence” in relationships and get connected with the small, but existent!, minority community or support organizations already present, there is a lot that a quieter, more rural life has to offer; it keeps them there, advocating for each other (joined by allies!) as well.



Next up: Uncertain and slightly dangerous’ • Motivations: Black Ownership & Generational Wealth’


*If you are considering moving to the country and will be of a minority group in a location, consider reaching out to your local NAACP and state ACLU to get an idea of the racial climate in your area. Do this in addition to your research on other aspects of local life: government, economic opportunity, industry, leisure, transportation, etc. Speak with living people and do not limit yourself to articles speaking of the ‘nation’ as a whole. Though there may be some shared trends, not every pocket of the country-or Country-is the same.

Copyright © 2018 A.M. Wilsonne

Image: Vecteezy.com

Originally posted July 1, 2018 at my poetry site, lalouvalalune.blog


Affordable Housing, City Living & Settling Down


“If you look at how long it takes for a person to save up to buy a house-that’s sort of the hot indicator now-San Francisco, you know, the Bay Area, we’re looking at 27 to 30 years. So basically, you’re just not going to buy a house. Seattle’s not there yet, but it’s still 15 or 16 years. And if you look back, right before the recession, it was probably eight years. So, what that’s telling millennials is that you shouldn’t even bother. Or you’re going to have to sort of re-think your idea of housing success. Or you’re gonna have to get politically active. So, all those narratives are playing out in cities like Seattle. ” 

– Paul Roberts, ‘How Did Housing Become So Expensive?‘, WBUR On Point, Broadcast May 2, 2018

Motivation: Affordable Housing, City Living & Settling Down

As I mention in She asks herself.., I am a millennial on a limited budget living in an increasingly prosperous city. In general, prosperity is good. Prosperity is sweet. Prosperity is sweet like a pie. This pie however, is unevenly baking. The slice of the pie that one gets depends on the circumstances of one’s seat at the table–if one can actually afford to sit at that table long enough to eat it.

As I get older, I feel a draw to be settled, but as I look around, I am challenged to envision my future within the city limits. Each year, the rent increase at lease signing and the potential of roommate re-finding buzz in my year a little more aggressively, stir my anxiety a little more fervently, than they did 365 days prior. The prosperity is driving up the cost to rent faster than paychecks can keep up, and it turns out that I am not alone. The challenge of affordable housing in thriving big cities is affecting communities all over the country. One affected demographic that I will primarily discuss in this piece is: the millennials.

On April 26, 2018, Politico Magazine published an article by Seattle journalist, Paul Roberts titled, ‘My Generation is Never Going to Have That‘. Yep. You read the title correctly. The bitter twinge of the absolutist introduction sets the stage for a tense, battle-ready, frustrated yet determined tone emanating from the language of the piece itself. Which high-stakes battle yields such a vocabulary from the journalist? The Seattle housing crisis. One example of many occurring in cities across the United States.

In the article, Roberts addresses what he calls “a paradox that threatens many of America’s most successful cities: the younger workers needed to maintain that urban success can no longer afford to live there.” He hones in on Seattle’s crises through the lens of 27 year old Seattle programmer and affordable housing social and political activist, Zach Lubarsky. “Since the end of the financial crisis,” Roberts writes, “… Seattle has added roughly 100,000 jobs, but barely 32,000 new homes and apartment units.” And so long as the demand for housing is so much higher than supply, the future of affordable housing costs continues to be threatened. In Zach Lubarsky’s case, he campaigns against restrictive zoning for single family homes that locks out whole portions of the city to potential tenants, while simultaneously advocating for more higher density, multi-family housing projects. The article goes into great detail about the extent of the housing crisis Seattle faces. It also goes into great detail about the extent to which Lubarsky and his tech peers are organizing to alleviate “a crisis that many in Seattle blame the tech industry for creating.” I recommend reading Roberts’ article in its entirety. There’s a lot learn.

Where Lobarsky focuses his solutions on what can be done within his city’s boundaries, with Land ho!, I turn my own millennial consideration, time and exploratory resources to…     the country. 

“We have plenty of locations typical folk don’t want to live in,” one commenter wrote in response to WBUR’s May 2nd podcast broadcast titled, ‘How Did Housing Become So Expensive?’, “I think folks need to be a bit more creative with where they look and this includes where business locates. The wealth needs to be spread out across the states. It’s much healthier than building super high densities in the big cities while leaving other smaller cities to rot.

On this WBUR broadcast, NPR media correspondent, David Folkenflik, features as guests: journalist, Paul Roberts; anthropologist and writer Elizabeth Greenspan; and University of California Berkeley professor, Carol Galante. The four address issues from rising construction costs to zoning laws, to historical racial discrimination in housing and more. The episode is rich with content, and I highly recommend listening! There is at least one weak point however, when it comes to the breadth of their conversation about the US housing and employment status quo; it is thankfully offset by the repeated appeals of callers. Commentary on the impacts of a tech-heavy job market and soaring housing prices skews towards urban centers primarily or urban centers alone. What about the [ripple] effect on the country as one whole? Incoming callers consistently invite the guest experts to consider economically struggling, non-urban communities in the midst of the national tech boom as well.

I posit the following solution, and it falls in line with WBUR’s commenter quoted earlier: Speaking as a city dweller considering how I can invest in a future in the country, settling down, working and participating in community outside of the physical and financial limitations of the metropolis, perhaps part of our national solution lies in an economic and social bridge between the city and the country? At one point in the broadcast, Roberts hints that ideas about investing outside of the city have crossed his path. I am paraphrasing from memory, but as far as he knows, the free market does not seem to favor these ventures. I recall that he did not express much faith or encouragement to explore the possibilities further, yet his response also hinted that creative alternatives to the gravitational pull towards city-life and its aspirations of urban prosperity, still have room to be explored at one’s own risk!

In search of way to wrap this up, I’ll end with these questions:

  • If I cannot buy a house in under 30 years, to enjoy it for myself in the prime of my life, does it render the pursuit useless? Does value end at my personal material benefit? What about children, generations to follow?
  • Must we only be driven by the markets? Why not be driven by our conscience? Would our collectively shifting desires impact the market to follow our lead? Could we impact businesses to follow our lead as well?

In upcoming posts, I will continue to address the spheres of interest, of passion, of motivation, of and vision that are actively converging as I explore: 1) land ownership, 2) in a rural setting, 3) with the intention to build a home and 4) all on a limited budget.

In the least, with regards to affordable housing, housing stability and settling down, I hope this adventure I’m setting out on is an encouragement towards more creative solutions in our current economy, keeping the entirety of the country in mind.  If the door seems shut or shutting on your opportunity to set down roots in the urban environment, or if the urban environment is already pushing you out, perhaps considering investment outside of the city will be the opening of a window. Perhaps instead of reacting to change, we can think of more ways to be proactive about a stable, affordable housing future. God willing, this will work out for me, but I hope not only for me. I implore other individuals, couples, friends and small families on a limited budget to not give up on a dream of one sitting at a table and prospering too.


Jeremiah 29:11



Copyright © 2018 A.M. Wilsonne

Originally posted June 13, 2018 at my poetry site, lalouvalalune.blog

The Journey Begins

The Spark of Inspiration

“What happens to a dream deferred?
Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun?”
-Langston Hughes, ‘Harlem’


Once upon the twenty first century, March 11, 1959 to be precise, a twenty-eight year old African American, female, middle class-raised, college drop-out, intellectual, journalist, activist, artist, communist, interracially married, queer, Chicago native author saw her original play premiere at the Ethel Barrymore Theatre on Broadway in New York City. Her play premiered in unprecedented circumstances while addressing equally unprecedented content for theater at the time: her play presented an intimate view into the life of a black American working class family residing in a major city of the United States. It was performed before white and black audience members alike, and it became wildly successful.

The woman’s name was Lorraine Hansberry,

and her play was titled, ‘A Raisin in the Sun’.

It was the first play written by a black woman, as well as the first play directed by a black man, Lloyd Richards, to ever premiere on Broadway.

In Spring 2018, to my luck, I watched the new PBS documentary on Hansberry’s life titled, ‘Lorraine Hansberry: Sighted Eyes/Feeling Heart’. Learning the details surrounding Hansberry’s life and play moved me deeply: it was written by herself, a black female, directed by a black man, performed by an all black cast, save one, and presented social issues of race, class, gender and integration, from a minority perspective, during the social reality of 1959.

As the film continued, footage from Hansberry’s life post-premiere also sparked a different kind of stirring within me. It was the stirring of an old desire, long forgotten and mostly dismissed, coming back to life and recognition. I experienced the power of image, of an example, of witnessing evidence of precedence with my own two eyes in the images moving across the screen: I saw a young, black woman living in the country, gathering firewood, playing with her dog, still abreast of the world, hosting visitors and working on her art (though honestly, not always enjoying the creation process nor isolating stretches).

It was the early 1960s in upstate New York…          and she looked like me.

My youthful enthusiasm for one day living in a more natural setting, even in the woods, didn’t seem so whimsical anymore; it seemed possible.


by Langston Hughes

What happens to a dream deferred?

      Does it dry up
      like a raisin in the sun?
      Or fester like a sore—
      And then run?
      Does it stink like rotten meat?
      Or crust and sugar over—
      like a syrupy sweet?
      Maybe it just sags
      like a heavy load.
      Or does it explode?
Copyright © 2018 A.M. Wilsonne
Originally posted June 3, 2018 at my poetry site, lalouvalalune.blog